KnotesFree Orthopaedic & FRCS notes, viva stations and higher order SBAs

Infected Hemiarthroplasty

Must KnowHipthinKbox SBA

Clinical image

Girdlestone situation after removal of an infected hip prosthesis

Girdlestone situation after removal of an infected hip prosthesis. Source: Wikimedia Commons — Mehlauge; CC BY-SA 3.0. Image binary is embedded locally in this package; original source and licence are retained.

Key points

Talking the talk

  • This is the supine AP front view of the left hip showing a modular bipolar hemiarthroplasty.
  • What concerns me is the radiolucencies seen in the Gruen zones 1,2,4, and 7. There appears to be a cortical break below the lesser trochanter. The acetabulum is porotic but head size not under or over sized. I would like to see the immediate post operative X-ray to know whether the stem has sunk and latest lateral view of left hip.

What do you think?

  • The prosthesis appears loose. It was inserted only 3 years back. The radiographs are highly suggestive of infection until proven otherwise.
  • I would take a thorough history covering the reason for the procedure, any leaking wound after surgery, UTI, chest infection or dental extraction, immunosuppressive comorbidities and smoking. I wound examine for signs of inflammation, health of the scar and do Full blood count, ESR and CRP
  • I will aspirate the hip if the pretest probability is high, especially if ESR and CRP are elevated.

How good is ESR and CRP

  • IL 6 more accurate than ESR and CRP (Berbari, JBJS am, 2010)

How useful is aspiration?

  • Image guided aspiration is highly sensitive and specific with high negative predictive value (all around 90%, but 67% PPV), especially with clinical features suggestive of infection or when ESR and CRP elevated. Spangehl JBJS Am, 1999

If aspiration negative

  • Bone scan T99 M Low specificity
  • Indium Leukocyte-more specific and sensitive
  • FDG-PET- Sensitive, does not diff infection from aseptic loosening

What would you do

  • I will sit with the patient and fully discuss what her problems and expectations are.
  • We have to reach an agreement on whether she would wish to proceed with revision surgery taking on board the potential risks and complications of surgery weighted against the probable benefits.
  • Proceed with 2 stage revision

Tsukayama Classification

  • Early Postoperative
  • Late Chronic
  • Haematogenous
  • Intraoperative

Prerequisites of 1 stage procedure

  • Known organism , sensitive to Ab
  • No pus
  • Elderly/patients with multiple medical problems
  • Success rate 0f 80% if antibiotic loaded cement used against 60% if not (Hanssen and Rand, JBJS 1998)

Advantages and Disadv of 2 stage procedure

  • More versatile: cemented/ uncemented/ bonegraft
  • Allows assessment of response to antibiotics
  • Difficult nursing
  • Difficult second surgery due to scarring, shortening and atrophy
  • PROSTALAC spacer is costly, can dislocate and fracture

Duration of antibiotics

  • No clear guideline
  • Wait for at least 6 week looking for good response
  • Most surgeons do 2nd stage at 3 months, 6 weeks antibiotics and further 6 weeks with out, monitoring CRP and ESR
  • Some aspirate before the procedure

5/6 of my last operations got infected

Theatre design

Principles

  • Stop operating and investigate
  • Find out whether organism was same: Staph aureus then nasal carrier-take swabs an appropriate treatment
  • Look for breakdown of theatre sterility: Microbiology investigate for laminar flow system
  • Fischer index :
    • at rest:<9 cfm /dm2/h
    • in activity: < 90/dm2/h
  • Instrument sterilisation and packing
  • Intra operative precautions breakdown
    • too much movement
    • opening and closing door

Theatre sterility

  • Operation theatre quality
    • Structure:
      • clean, sterile and dirty areas clearly demarcated
      • Surfaces easy to clean
    • Contamination controlled airflow system (HVAC system) ;Controls temperature, humidity and airflow
      • Involves: Ventilation, pressurisation, filtration and air distribution
      • HEPA filter 99.97% reduction of particles above 0.3 microns
      • Ventilation
  • Water supply
  • Procedural and Behavioural factors
    • Attire
    • Preparation in another room
    • Use correct plenum
    • Limiting needless activity
    • WHO check list

Ventilation

  • Unidirectional
    • LAF
      • Horizontal
      • Vertical
      • Exponential
  • Turbulent
  • Mixed

Classic studies

  • Charnley: 7% reduced to 0.5% with
    • Unidirectional flow
    • High pressure
    • Exhaust suit
    • High rate of air exchange
  • Lidwell: Further reduction in infection with ultra clean air
  • A meta-analysis encompassing 26 studies could not ultimately confirm the role of LAF in surgery
  • Some recent studies have even indicated an increase in SSI after hip prosthesis with procedures performed under LAF (Christian Brandt, germany)

Written/reviewed by Kishore Puthezhath

Professor of Orthopaedics and Consultant Paediatric Orthopaedic Surgeon

FRCS (Tr & Orth) revision resource

Reviewed: September 2026