Hand
Thumb Base Arthritis Hand
Epidemiology
80% of postmenopausal women have XR changes
XR doesn’t always correlate with symptoms
Anatomy of CMCJ
Saddle shaped
3 Ligaments
Dorsal
Lateral
Volar Ulnar - Beak (most important)
Aetiology
Beak ligament attenuation and rupture leads to instability of CMCJ
Instability leads to arthritis
Presenting Features
Activity-related pain
Weak grip
Pain and weakness opening jars
Night pain
Superimposed carpal tunnel syndrome common (40%)
Examination
Wasted thenar eminence – disuse
Squaring of thumb base
Adducted 1st metacarpal
Compensatory MCPJ hyperextension – increases hand span
Grind Test
Axial compression and grind
Less pain on distraction and grinding
Crank Test
Axial compression and flexion, extension pain
Investigations
AP hand
Roberts view (true AP of thumb)
Thumb maximally abducted & forearm maximally pronated
Classification (Eaton & Littler)
Stage 1
Joint space widening
Synovitis and effusion
No OA changes
Stage 2
Osteophytes <2mm in size
Mild subluxation
Joint space narrowing
Stage 3
Osteophytes >2mm in size
Significant subluxation
Joint more significantly narrowed
Stage 4
Widespread arthritis – especially of STT joint
Management
Treat symptoms and functional impairment – not XR
Non-Operative
Splinting
Physio (thenar muscle strengthening)
Activity modification
Analgesia
Corticosteroid injection – in clinic or theatre
Operative Management
Decision making based on:
Pain
Functional expectations
Degree of arthritis
Trapezium Preservation
No arthritis
Instability-related pain
Thumb Metacarpal Stabilisation with Split FCR
Reconstructs the Beak ligament
Extension Osteotomy
Trapezium Sacrificing Procedures
Trapeziectomy
Gold standard for patients overall
80-90% good results
Problems:
Thumb will be weaker
Instability of Metacarpal
Trapeziectomy plus Ligament Reconstruction and Interposition
Postulated to have better results
Not proven in any study
Arthrodesis
For young manual workers only
Preserves power
Clenched fist position:
30° abduction
20° flexion
Technically difficult and prone to complications
Osteotomy – Abduction, Extension
Good results described for Stage 1-3
Arthroplasty
Ball and socket constrained design
Previous failures
Still some good series
Lacks follow-up > 3 years
Higher complication rate
Outcomes
In general, all procedures have an 80-90% success with good selection
Warn regarding long rehab time and time to see full benefit – 3-6 months
Need for splinting for 3-6 months
Related FRCS revision notes Written/reviewed by Kishore Puthezhath
Professor of Orthopaedics and Consultant Paediatric Orthopaedic Surgeon
FRCS (Tr & Orth) revision resource
Reviewed: September 2026
Core revision references: Miller's Review of Orthopaedics; Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics; Orthobullets . Current specialty guidelines are linked within individual notes where applicable.
Prefer studying offline? thinKbox FRCS adds offline personal notes, backlinks, flashcards, spaced review, device-specific capture and private local AI. See the app →